JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 26, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Carlos Andres Moreno Roa Vs. Das

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre La Sala Disciplinaria Del Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Cundinamarca, El Juzgado 15 Civil Del Circuito De Bogota Y El Tribunal Superior Del Distrito Judicial De Bogota Sala Civil. Ordena Remitir El Expediente A La Sala Disciplinaria Del Consejo Seccional De La Judicatura De Cundinamarca
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Consejos Seccional y Superior de la Judicatura sala disciplinaria
  • Competencia a prevención
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional, en Sala Plena,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Remitase el expediente contentivo de la accion de tutela propuesta por el ciudadano Carlos Andres Moreno Roa contra el Departamento Administrativo de Seguridad -DAS-, a la Sala Disciplinaria del Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Cundinamarca para que la tramite y decida en forma inmediata.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.